← Search

Jennifer Danesis

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 69W–43L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Danesis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-09-14 · DToomey/ASauls (Olde Providence) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ginger Daly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-11 · AConger/DConrad (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Keiran Llaneza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-04 · AConger/DConrad (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Smulktis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-31 · DToomey/ASauls (Olde Providence) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Sauls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · AConger/DConrad (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danielle Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Elizabeth Rust / Diana Sandelovsky
2026-08-07 · AConger/DConrad (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Smulktis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · DToomey/ASauls (Olde Providence) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Sauls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · KWalsh/ELentz (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Croom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-20 · SBrown/KWagner (OPRC) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · KWagner (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keiran Llaneza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-13 · SBrown/KWagner (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Croom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-10 · KWagner (OPRC) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.8% of games
3.5
73.9%
34W–12L · 60.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–11L · 34.2% of games
6.5
75%
12W–4L · 56.3% of games
7.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#1 Singles
13%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#1 Female Singles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams