← Search

Suzanne Purdy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 63W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history129 matches
W
2026-10-02 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Blandford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-21 · SPurdy (Charlotte Tennis) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joan Slep
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-07 · SPurdy (Charlotte Tennis) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Renk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-09-04 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellen Gibel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6
W
2026-08-17 · SPurdy (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mildred Deely
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-14 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Walker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-27 · VGreenway/Shim (Charlotte Tennis) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bond
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · VGreenway/Shim (Charlotte Tennis) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bond
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-04-13 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Renk
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-10 · GMurrell/TEvans (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Johnsen
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-03 · GMurrell/TEvans (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Batten
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-30 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Renk
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
20%
2W–8L · 32.5% of games
3.0
57.1%
24W–18L · 50.6% of games
3.5
23.8%
5W–16L · 36.2% of games
5.5
79.3%
23W–6L · 66.9% of games
6.5
33.3%
9W–18L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer