← Search

Wendy Jourdan

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 99W–79L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Wendy Jourdan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
L
2026-09-10 · MEshleman (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-03 · MEshleman (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marisa Haehnlein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-31 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Margaux Karagosian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Margaux Karagosian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-17 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Emison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-24 · HMcClure/AChristie (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Emison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · HMcClure/AChristie (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaux Karagosian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-17 · HMcClure/AChristie (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen Johnstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-13 · ASelf (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Emison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rich Pietrykowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-02 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 62.9% of games
4.0
63.2%
43W–25L · 54.7% of games
4.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 33.3% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 67.8% of games
7.5
60%
21W–14L · 52.3% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams