← Search

Rich Pietrykowski

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 57W–73L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Rich Pietrykowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-09-08 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rod Wilkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tom Stapleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kent Franks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Hausmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Scovanner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-30 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-28 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jourdan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.9% of games
4.0
46.3%
19W–22L · 51.2% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.9% of games
7.5
35.1%
13W–24L · 44.4% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 42.3% of games
4.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams