← Search

Kent Franks

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 107W–92L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kent Franks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
W
2026-08-31 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ken Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rich Pietrykowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kyle Harding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kyle Harding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rod Wilkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-30 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Emison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-29 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Emison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Emison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-02 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Johnstone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Kerr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
51.5%
34W–32L · 51% of games
4.0
48%
12W–13L · 50.9% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 51.4% of games
7.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 52.1% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.4% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.8% of games
4.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 45.3% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
42 matches
#3 Singles
5%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#1 Male Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer