← Search

Nate Hookman

Lancaster, SC
3.5S year-end 2025
31 matches · 26W–5L · seasons 2026–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.61
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
8%
stay 3.5
92%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 49% stay · 51% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.50. Lower than today’s 3.61 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
SC · 3.5
7 of 27
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Nate is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
90%
9W–1L · 60.6% of games
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 60.7% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Oren Golanski
−0.006about as expected — took 62% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Dana Ferguson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Christopher Greiner / Franchone Beychamps
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Dany Marie
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 7-5
W
Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan / Chirag Dua
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Greer
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wojnowich
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steve Rider
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
W
Kibbee Reese / Roger Gaines
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Greer
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
W
Zachary Wagner / Kate Wagnermixed
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wojnowich
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
John Hasty / Kevin Ferreira
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiger Zhang
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Chris Blankenship / Andrew Backuschamps
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with David Greer
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-4
W
Ben Hawkins / Robert Pelosichamps
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with David Greer
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-2
W
Kibbee Reese / Roger Gaines
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Webb
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.