Search

Matt McNealy

year-end
18 matches · 8W–10L · seasons 20262026

Captains: add Matt McNealy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2026-09-03 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-27 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rick Haskell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Sledd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Sledd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Todd Pickens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Ellsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-03 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wynn Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-22 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rick Haskell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rick Haskell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-24 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trey Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trey Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 36.6% of games
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.6% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams