← Search

Tim Hausmann

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 56W–60L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Tim Hausmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-09-08 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ken Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chuck Norton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-18 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rich Pietrykowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly McClure mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Jenkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela MacMurphy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-11 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly McClure mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Jenkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela MacMurphy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-25 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly McClure mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 51.8% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 40.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 43.9% of games
7.5
40.7%
11W–16L · 49.1% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 60.1% of games
4.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
35 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert