← Search

Anthony Lasala

Fort Mill, SC
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
70 matches · 43W–27L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Anthony Lasala to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-09-03 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christopher Gowin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brandon Adcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · DBrantmeyer (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephen Pikus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-06 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Peter Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · CChildress/Nguyen (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Childress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-23 · CChildress/Nguyen (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Childress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · KSwain (Mason Wallace) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Volodymyr Stakh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · CChildress/Nguyen (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Childress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · JClarke (Mason Wallace) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-02 · CChildress/Nguyen (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Sickles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70%
14W–6L · 60.2% of games
4.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.3% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.3% of games
4.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#1 Singles
20%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe