← Search

Simas Petrikis

Matthews, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 57W–78L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Simas Petrikis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-08-06 · FMasucci (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Sperry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-29 · TCastain (WSRC) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Trantham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · TCastain (WSRC) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · TCastain (WSRC) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-07 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Silvia Petrikis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · TCastain (WSRC) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Silvia Petrikis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adele Petrikis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · TCastain (WSRC) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Silvia Petrikis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · JRitter (Weddington) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Premkumar Jagannathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.3% of games
4.0
29%
20W–49L · 41.8% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 57.5% of games
8.5
0%
0W–7L · 30.6% of games
4.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#1 Singles
27%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
22 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King