← Search

Kristopher Tremblay

Charlotte, NC
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
37 matches · 21W–16L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Kristopher Tremblay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-09-07 · KTremblay (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Connor Lennon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-31 · KTremblay (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karan Gupta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-24 · KTremblay (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karan Gupta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · KTremblay (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Collin Lohnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · KTremblay (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Connor Lennon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · JTchirkow/IFuster (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with JACK TCHIRKOW
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-30 · CBiedrzycki (Veterans Park) · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Sturgeon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sydney Gaston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-02 · CBiedrzycki (Veterans Park) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · CBiedrzycki (Veterans Park) · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sydney Gaston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75%
12W–4L · 62.4% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 49.3% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.1% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 45.8% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#3 Singles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams