← Search

Dustin Ingram

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
299 matches · 105W–194L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history299 matches
L
2026-09-21 · JMorse (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Daniel Muhtar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-07 · JMorse (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ivan Blakeney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · JMorse (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Will Gardner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · JMorse (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Granger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Booker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophie Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vien Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-05 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Booker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brent Moulton
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-30 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Begley
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams101 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.3% of games
2.5
26.9%
7W–19L · 39.4% of games
3.0
55.4%
51W–41L · 51.8% of games
3.5
18.9%
14W–60L · 35.4% of games
4.0
30%
6W–14L · 36.6% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.3% of games
6.5
5.6%
1W–17L · 40.1% of games
7.5
0%
0W–13L · 32% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.8% of games
3.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.5% of games
5.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.7% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
102 matches
#1 Singles
10%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
29 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches
#3 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe