← Search

John Semones

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 44W–33L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add John Semones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-03 · SGerbereux (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mehmet Karakus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · SGerbereux (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alan Efremoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Kane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Goldblatt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-02 · MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Kane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Semones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Semones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-28 · JSemones (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Gerbereux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · JSemones (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Halvorsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-07 · JSemones (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Loren Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-10 · JSemones (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Halvorsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-03 · JSemones (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Marxen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
64.7%
22W–12L · 56.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 51.6% of games
9.0
80%
4W–1L · 61.3% of games
4.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 50.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer