← Search

Benjamin Shamanis

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 76W–44L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Benjamin Shamanis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-09-10 · GEstrada (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samuel Premkumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michal Jarzynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · GEstrada (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rafael Balderrama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Keegan Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · SKarasik/AKaiser (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · JMarks (PCC) · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-21 · JMarks (PCC) · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michal Jarzynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-07 · SKarasik/AKaiser (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheila Walsh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · BShamanis (Queens) · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 60.3% of games
4.0
61.1%
33W–21L · 56.4% of games
4.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.1% of games
7.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 61.7% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.7% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#2 Singles
10%
12 matches
#3 Singles
7%
8 matches
#1 Male Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal