← Search

Keegan Merck

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cary, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 40W–25L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history65 matches
L
2026-10-06 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michal Jarzynski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-29 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brandon Thio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-15 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Maio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Maio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tiger Zhang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Maio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Benjamin Shamanis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joseph Cochran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Mixon
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-04-20 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-04-13 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nick Gartner
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-06 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Randall Maddle
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
100%
15W–0L · 66.3% of games
4.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 46% of games
8.5
60%
6W–4L · 53.1% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal