← Search

Nilay Dixit

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 29W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Nilay Dixit to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-09-08 · SKarasik/DJKarasik (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luke Mixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · SKarasik/DJKarasik (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with DJ Karasik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · SKarasik/DJKarasik (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with BJ Beecher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · SKarasik/AKaiser (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Huggins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · SKarasik/AKaiser (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina McWilliams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · SKarasik/AKaiser (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · SKarasik/AKaiser (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Huggins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-07 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-23 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-17 · BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-09 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-02 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
7W–0L · 77.1% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.7% of games
8.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 63.6% of games
4.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 63.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
17 matches
#1 Singles
25%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King