← Search

Gregory Grimm-Oropesa

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 33W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Gregory Grimm-Oropesa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-10 · JTchirkow/IFuster (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Evan Zolcak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · JTchirkow/IFuster (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Evan Zolcak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-06 · JTchirkow/IFuster (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Mapa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Self mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-06 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Self mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Fenwick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-08 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Self mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.4% of games
4.0
37.9%
11W–18L · 42.4% of games
7.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.4% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.2% of games
4.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#2 Singles
18%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#1 Male Singles
7%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams