← Search

Michelle Ziewacz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 58W–67L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history125 matches
W
2026-10-02 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Erin Carroll
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-25 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Erin Carroll
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-18 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tricia Green
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
Default
2026-07-30 · MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Loren Kane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-02 · MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Hickey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Hickey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew McWilliams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-04 · AConger (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keiran Llaneza
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · AConger (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arlene Conger
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-30 · AConger (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Lineberger
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-27 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Parker
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-23 · AConger (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Lineberger
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.8% of games
4.0
42.2%
19W–26L · 46% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 30.6% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.6% of games
8.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.9% of games
4.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert