← Search

Mary Parker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 83W–109L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history192 matches
L
2026-09-26 · TMcIver/CPurvis (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Lewisohn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-04 · TMcIver/CPurvis (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Marcus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-28 · TMcIver/CPurvis (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jenny Havens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-08-14 · TMcIver/CPurvis (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Marcus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-23 · NHaskins (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Graham
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-1
L
2026-04-21 · PDonoghue (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Donoghue
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-14 · PDonoghue (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Haskins
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-03 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Crosby
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-02 · NHaskins (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Weaver
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-27 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Ziewacz
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-24 · PDonoghue (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Graham
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-17 · PDonoghue (Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Castain
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.7% of games
3.5
64%
16W–9L · 55.3% of games
4.0
37.9%
25W–41L · 47.7% of games
4.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 33.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.2% of games
7.5
61.5%
24W–15L · 53.9% of games
8.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 41% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams