← Search

Bharath Bhaskar

INDIAN TRAIL, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 150W–60L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Bharath Bhaskar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history210 matches
W
2026-09-03 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Raj Voleti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-27 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Raj Voleti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Raj Voleti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-06 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Raj Voleti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · WParker/BBhaskar (Mason Wallace) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Austin Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #4 Doubles · with Justin Brynn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · #4 Doubles · with Christopher Northrop championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Jonathan Peters / Chris Robertson
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Justin Brynn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · #4 Doubles · with Justin Brynn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · WParker (Mason Wallace) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Crysler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · WParker/BBhaskar (Mason Wallace) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Brinneman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · WParker (Mason Wallace) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.1% of games
4.0
70%
35W–15L · 58.5% of games
7.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 66.4% of games
8.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 58.5% of games
4.0mixed
90.6%
29W–3L · 64% of games
8.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 61.7% of games
9.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova