← Search

Keenan Ahern

CHARLOTTE, NC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 33W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Keenan Ahern to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-10 · BMogelefsky (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-09-03 · BMogelefsky (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Mogelefsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-20 · MAhern/BBonikowski (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Gluff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-15 · GReuter (Veterans Park) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · MAhern/BBonikowski (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Ahern mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-01 · GReuter (Veterans Park) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-28 · MAhern/BBonikowski (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Ahern mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · CGluff (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Snearly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-07 · CGluff (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Jewell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · CGluff (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Don Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-10 · CGluff (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Jewell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-03-03 · CGluff (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Gluff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
65%
13W–7L · 57.3% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 36% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 42.4% of games
8.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 50.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
12 matches
#1 Singles
15%
10 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert