← Search

Jennifer Gluff

Fort Mill, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
284 matches · 176W–108L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Gluff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history284 matches
W
2026-09-03 · MCTA40/Sharp/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brenda Usina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · KCrane (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-21 · KCrane (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-20 · MCTA40/Sharp/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · KCrane (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Burkhamer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · KCrane (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · MCTA40/Sharp/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-08-03 · MAhern/BBonikowski (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Gluff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-31 · JGluff (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cecile Yager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · MCTA40/Sharp/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · JGluff (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nataliya Rubanenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · MAhern/BBonikowski (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keenan Ahern mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
40%
4W–6L · 45.6% of games
3.5
62.2%
46W–28L · 56.6% of games
4.0
57.4%
39W–29L · 50.4% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 53% of games
7.5
71.7%
43W–17L · 57.4% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
14W–4L · 60.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
136 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
43 matches
#1 Singles
9%
25 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova