← Search

Tricia Green

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Matthews, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 109W–48L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history157 matches
W
2026-10-09 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Hoben
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-10-05 · FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Liz Misenheimer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Ziewacz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-28 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Hoben
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-26 · FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nily Willis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Hoben
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-03-20 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fumiyo Ono
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-10-10 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danna Jean Pompeo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-09-29 · FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danna Jean Pompeo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-09-19 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danna Jean Pompeo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-09-08 · FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Hoben
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-05 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Hoben
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 64.7% of games
4.0
87.9%
29W–4L · 63.5% of games
4.5
44.8%
13W–16L · 53.2% of games
7.5
88.5%
23W–3L · 67% of games
8.5
63.1%
41W–24L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
45 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal