← Search

Ashley Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 87W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history131 matches
W
2026-10-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Enid Randall championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-10-02 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Enid Randall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-21 · AAugustine/Titlestad (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Courtney Reynolds
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-18 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Enid Randall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-04 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Enid Randall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · AAugustine/Titlestad (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katharine Cheek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katharine Cheek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Monica Nee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Enid Randall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Enid Randall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzannah Hicks
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · LGignac (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Enid Randall
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.4% of games
4.0
78.9%
30W–8L · 63.2% of games
4.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 51.1% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.7% of games
8.5
70%
28W–12L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
42 matches
#1 Singles
31%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe