Teams

MCTA40/Bhamidipati/RHTC

COMBO 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult Women - 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-17vs MCTA40/Michalski/RHTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSeung Hee Noh / Scarlett Cochran vs Carla Litrenta / Dana Adams7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnait Balasanyan / Rae Lynn Pope vs Lori Huechtker / Jessica Ambrose6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Siddall / Karen Moss vs Sonia Hassani / Kelley Michalski6-1, 6-4
2026-08-10vs MCTA40/Craft/RHTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Hoover / Jennifer Siddall vs Mary Stewart Chatman / Terra Dixon6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRae Lynn Pope / Peggy Reimann vs Carrie Marlowe / Christy ACEVEDO6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCharmaine Gittens / Karen Moss vs Volree Wade / Natalie Costello3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-27vs MCTA40/Michalski/RHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnait Balasanyan / Naomi O'Brien vs Melissa Covington / Dana Adams7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Hoover / Jennifer Siddall vs Lori Huechtker / Ashlee Pickering6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSharon Sullivan / Rae Lynn Pope vs Carla Litrenta / Jill Lindsey Kays Konst6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-07-20vs MCTA40/Craft/RHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesScarlett Cochran / Sharon Sullivan vs Mayela Magur / Cathy Anderson7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Charmaine Gittens vs Carrie Marlowe / Samantha Borte6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Moss / Stacey Whitney vs Christy ACEVEDO / Terra Dixon7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Cynthia Hoover
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.51
Naomi O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Stacey Whitney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Charmaine Gittens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Rae Lynn Pope
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Scarlett Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Peggy Reimann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Jennifer Siddall
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Anait Balasanyan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Sharon Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Seung Hee Noh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rae Lynn Pope + Cynthia Hoover7560% games+7.6% vs expected
Avani Bhamidipati + Anait Balasanyan10554% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Hoover + Scarlett Cochran404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Hoover
301W–123L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Naomi O'Brien
134W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Stacey Whitney
179W–136L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Charmaine Gittens
20W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Rae Lynn Pope
68W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Scarlett Cochran
74W–61L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3
Peggy Reimann
100W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
3
Jennifer Siddall
71W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Anait Balasanyan
56W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Sharon Sullivan
10W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Seung Hee Noh
38W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Avani Bhamidipati
32W–35L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.