← Search

Sarah Garner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 79W–49L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history128 matches
W
2026-09-16 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacey Whitney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-09-02 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Rhoten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacey Whitney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacey Whitney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Rhoten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · KCronin/Chapman (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Wellman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · KCronin/Chapman (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Garner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · KCronin/Chapman (Piper Glen) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Garner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · KCronin/Chapman (Piper Glen) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Garner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-28 · KCronin/Chapman (Piper Glen) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Garner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-19 · KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tyler Brody championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tyler Brody
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.8% of games
3.0
75.8%
25W–8L · 57.2% of games
3.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 47.7% of games
5.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.8% of games
6.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 55.6% of games
3.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 60.9% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams