← Search

Greg Ladky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.0M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
12 matches · 1W–11L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history12 matches
L
2026-07-30 · LSupernavage/MHenninger (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Ladky mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-02 · LSupernavage/MHenninger (Raintree) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Ladky mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · LSupernavage/MHenninger (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Ladky mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-28 · MHenninger/LSupernavage (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Ladky mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-14 · MHenninger/LSupernavage (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Joiner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-07 · MHenninger/LSupernavage (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Ladky mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-04 · MHenninger (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Ladky mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-08 · MHenninger (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Joiner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-01 · MHenninger (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Ladky mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-03-01 · APlaisance (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-12 · APlaisance (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emily Ladky mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2021-06-15 · APlaisance (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emily Ladky mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 28.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 67% of the time
#2 Doubles
67%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#1 Singles
8%
1 match
#3 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams