← Search

Andy Hunt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Matthews, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 44W–71L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history115 matches
W
2026-09-30 · AHunt (Charlotte Tennis Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Greiner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-29 · AHunt (Charlotte Tennis Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Greiner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-15 · AHunt (Charlotte Tennis Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Greiner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-08 · AHunt (Charlotte Tennis Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Greiner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-01 · AHunt (Charlotte Tennis Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Todd Kasler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · AHunt (Charlotte Tennis Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Greiner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · AHunt (Charlotte Tennis Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Whiteman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-06-30 · TFunderburk (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicky Bureau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · TFunderburk (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Renk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · TFunderburk (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-20 · AHunt (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Whiteman
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-13 · AHunt (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Lucas
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 31.5% of games
3.5
29.6%
8W–19L · 41.2% of games
6.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 47.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.4% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams