← Search

Peter Sofarelli

Matthews, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 86W–49L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Peter Sofarelli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-08-25 · JWolf (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Marthinsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-18 · JWolf (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martin Iles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · JWolf (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Marthinsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-03 · JWolf (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Murchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · MRousseaux (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Castain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · KFoster (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Gasparro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · MRousseaux (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Castain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · KFoster (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Ovendorf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · BHarrell/NLeCroy (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Holcman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-07-02 · MRousseaux (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with AMY SAFIR mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · KFoster (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori van Blarcom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-2, 0-0
W
2026-06-23 · KFoster (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Gasparro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
78.4%
29W–8L · 61.4% of games
4.0
30%
6W–14L · 41.5% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.7% of games
7.5
60%
18W–12L · 53.2% of games
3.5mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 63.2% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.7% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams