← Search

Joanne Lindley

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 19W–27L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Joanne Lindley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-09-11 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-04 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsay Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · SBarden (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Malecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · SBarden (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Tringali mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-02 · SBarden (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Malecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · SBarden (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Rasberry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
Lisa Long / Brandi Marks
2026-04-27 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-13 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth McGregor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-30 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Blandford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-03-26 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Jill Halverstam / Elizabeth Workman
2026-02-01 · SPurdy (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 54.5% of games
3.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 42% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
4W–6L · 48.1% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 31.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer