← Search

Peter Hollis

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 59W–56L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Peter Hollis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
L
2026-09-08 · KFox/JRobinson (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ramesh Thyagarajan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-01 · KFox/JRobinson (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Bartholomew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-31 · THodge (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ricky Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-25 · KFox/JRobinson (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Devesh Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-18 · KFox/JRobinson (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · THodge (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kartik Mahalingam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Konstantin Archakov / Kyle Johnson
2026-08-03 · THodge (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ricky Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · RMyers (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Dickinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · RMyers (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judi Hollis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · RMyers (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judi Hollis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-21 · RMyers (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judi Hollis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · RO'Rourke/DTyson (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Robinette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
59.6%
28W–19L · 54.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 42.7% of games
7.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 51.6% of games
3.5mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 43.3% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal