Search

Emily Ladky

Charlotte, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
76 matches · 25W–51L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
18%
stay 2.5
82%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 63% stay · 37% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.47. Lower than today’s 2.57 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Charlotte · 2.5
9 of 11
NC · 2.5
14 of 19
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Emily is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has been 2.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.02.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.5, Emily has gone from the 50th to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
46.9%
15W–17L · 50.7% of games
3.0
0%
0W–10L · 23.4% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.5% of games
5.5
50%
9W–9L · 52.8% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 20.2% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history76 matches
L
Sarah Garner / Matthew Wellmanmixed
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Ladky
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
Donna Callinan / Erica Testerman
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crissa Klein
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Kevin Troxell / Sarah Bardenmixed
2026-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Ladky
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
Krisha Blanchard / Jan Albright
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Hall
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Hall
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
Kenrick Samuelson / Savannah Samuelsonmixed
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Ladky
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
Kinnera Angadi / Payal K
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryn Padula
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.009below expectation — took 8% of games against 19% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Leah Hackworth / Emilia Anderson
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Reeves
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-0
L
Sara Shelor / Heather Toye
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anje Seufert
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-09 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.020about as expected — took 25% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Jennifer George / Tiffany Ashmore
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Tucker
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.