Suzanne MacVicar
Charlotte, NC
190 matches · 89W–101L · seasons 2021–2026
Captains: add Suzanne MacVicar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history190 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Kendall Smith / Sarah Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
AHall (Raintree)
ASchwartz (Raintree)
DCallinan/ELaur (Raintree)
JAckerlund (Raintree)
JAckerlund (Raintree) Saved By The Ace
LHumphries (Raintree)
LHumphries/Miller (Raintree)
LSupernavage (Raintree); Baby Got Backhand
LSupernavage/MHenninger (Raintree)
SChandler/Eggers (Raintree)
SMacVicar (Raintree)
SMacVicar (Raintree)
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
48.3%
29W–31L · 50.7% of games
3.0
50.8%
32W–31L · 50.5% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 40% of games
5.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.7% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 54.5% of games
3.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 49% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#1 Singles
11%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
5%
10 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.