← Search

Mark Hammond

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simi Valley, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 49W–53L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history102 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Mission Oaks Dragons · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Longbin Liu
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-27 · The Young & the Breathless · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Hammond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-26 · Mission Oaks Dragons · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Swanson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · Mission Oaks Dragons · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donald Matthews
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Mission Oaks Dragons · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Xiaodong Shen
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · Mission Oaks Dragons · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Troy Trinh
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-06 · Mission Oaks Dragons · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Swanson
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · Mission Oaks Dragons · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Swanson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · Mission Oaks Dragons · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donald Matthews
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · Mission Oaks Dragons · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thai Takeuchi
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-04 · SFV - 8.0 Deuce Busters · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sanaz Ossanloo mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-02 · SFV - 8.0 Deuce Busters · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Hammond mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
54.1%
20W–17L · 53.4% of games
4.5
27.3%
6W–16L · 39.3% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.8%
21W–18L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams