← Search

Noreena Cole

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 36W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history75 matches
L
2026-10-12 · Titzer/Jones 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Osteen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-05 · Titzer/Jones 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Osteen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-25 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Kelly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-18 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Reynolds
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-31 · Titzer/Jones 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teresa Dail
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-07 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betsey Wells
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-31 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betsey Wells
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · Chapman-Partagas 65s 3.0W Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Faye Halvorsen championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Chapman-Partagas 65s 3.0W Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Faye Halvorsen championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-22 · Chapman-Partagas 65s 3.0W Wed AM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Elium
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · Chapman-Partagas 65s 3.0W Wed AM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Faye Halvorsen
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-03-21 · Chapman-Partagas 65s 3.0W Wed AM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Ann Lapp
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55%
11W–9L · 51.2% of games
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 49.4% of games
6.5
46.9%
15W–17L · 43.8% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
20 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King