← Search

Margaret Reynolds

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
High Point, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 108W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history190 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Chapman/Partagas 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Barman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-10-08 · Propst / Nadel 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Myra Propst
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · Chapman/Partagas 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Barman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-18 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Noreena Cole
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-04 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betty Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-31 · Chapman/Partagas 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betty Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-27 · Propst / Nadel 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Myra Propst
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · Chapman/Partagas 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Barman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-21 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Barman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · Chapman/Partagas 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ila Rosenthal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Faye Halvorsen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-13 · Propst / Nadel 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Wood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
52.9%
46W–41L · 50.8% of games
4.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 39.3% of games
6.5
66.7%
54W–27L · 56.3% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer