← Search

Bruce Brandler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHESTERFIELD, VA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
13 matches · 6W–7L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history13 matches
L
2023-07-16 · HCC - Wolfe · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Ketelesleger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-08 · HCC - Wolfe · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Farley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-05-07 · HCC - Wolfe · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bryan Perry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-07-24 · Mechanicsburg - Landis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenks Landis championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2022-07-10 · Mechanicsburg - Landis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Carson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-06-12 · Mechanicsburg - Landis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenks Landis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2022-05-16 · Mechanicsburg - Landis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Baxley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2021-07-24 · Mechanicsburg - Landis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neil Boyd championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2021-06-16 · Mechanicsburg - Landis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with C Fridirici
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2021-05-16 · Mechanicsburg - Landis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2019-07-13 · CPD/Hershey - Ketelsleger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2019-06-30 · CPD/Hershey - Ketelsleger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Sheives
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams