← Search

Troy Petry

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
York, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 148W–96L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history244 matches
L
2026-07-26 · Yacta - Rebert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Greenholt
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Yacta - Rebert · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Rebert
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · Yacta - Rebert · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wes Hawk
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · Yacta - Rebert · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Kimber
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Yacta - Rebert · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Greenholt
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-28 · Hanover - Rebert · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Phillips
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-24 · Hanover - Rebert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Phillips
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-07-20 · Hanover - Rebert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wes Hawk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-01 · Hanover - Rebert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wes Hawk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-29 · Hanover - Rebert · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Sargent
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-04-04 · Wisehaven - Crowley · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Lanza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-02 · YACTA - Greenholt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Lady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
76%
19W–6L · 59.8% of games
7.0
76.3%
29W–9L · 59.6% of games
8.0
48.5%
16W–17L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
61.2%
74W–47L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
8W–16L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
149 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
36 matches
Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova