← Search

Gregg Pearson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mountville, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
449 matches · 303W–146L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history449 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Hempfield - Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Groff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-18 · Hempfield - Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Groff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Glatsky championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Donahue championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Donahue championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Hempfield - Clark · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Groff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frederick JR Shaak championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frederick JR Shaak
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Chamberlin
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-12 · RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Nichols
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederick JR Shaak championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Schrader
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
68.9%
71W–32L · 57.7% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
64.9%
24W–13L · 57.2% of games
8.0
77.1%
37W–11L · 58.2% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
73.3%
99W–36L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
70W–50L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
229 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
159 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Male Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe