← Search

Joe Schrader

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
307 matches · 185W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history307 matches
L
2026-10-31 · RCW - Zink · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bernard Ilkhanoff
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Glatsky championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bernard Ilkhanoff championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bernard Ilkhanoff championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Sambrick
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregg Pearson
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Jeffrey
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-28 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jody Sambrick
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ariff Sumar
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · Hempfield - Scott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Opilo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · Hempfield - Scott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Claire Shaak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62.1%
41W–25L · 55.7% of games
4.0
30.3%
10W–23L · 44% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 69.7% of games
7.0
68%
17W–8L · 56.8% of games
8.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 54.9% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
73.4%
69W–25L · 56.9% of games
8.0mixed
47.8%
22W–24L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
126 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
84 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King