← Search

Steven Jeffrey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lititz, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 147W–85L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history232 matches
L
2026-10-23 · RCW - Zink · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Hanna
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-10-18 · Hempfield - Clark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Jeffrey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-17 · RCW - Zink · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hugo VanderGoes
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · Hempfield - Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Broskey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-10-10 · RCW - Zink · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Donahue
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-18 · Hempfield Hydrate with Hops - Brink · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Madonna Hufnagel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · RCW - Zink · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikolaus Stoltzfus
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-26 · RCW - Campbell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Fortson
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frederick JR Shaak
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · RCW - Sumar · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Schrader
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-22 · RCW - Campbell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Fortson
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 60.5% of games
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.5% of games
3.5
63.3%
31W–18L · 55.3% of games
4.0
40%
10W–15L · 47.7% of games
6.0
75%
15W–5L · 60.6% of games
7.0
64%
16W–9L · 57.6% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 44.4% of games
6.0mixed
76.2%
16W–5L · 60.9% of games
7.0mixed
73.1%
38W–14L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal