← Search

Scott Simmons

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lititz, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 22W–45L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history67 matches
L
2026-08-11 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Schenk
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Schenk
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-28 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikolaus Stoltzfus
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-25 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Manifold championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-21 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Schenk
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · Hempfield - Simmons/Pipkin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Schenk
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Manifold
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · Hempfield - Simmons/Pipkin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Berthelyn San Jose
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-30 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Nalywayko
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · Hempfield - Simmons/Pipkin · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pahn Sisay
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Manifold
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-16 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Manifold
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
36.8%
14W–24L · 47.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 21.9% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 51.5% of games
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King