← Search

Mark Schenk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 61W–83L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history144 matches
W
2026-10-17 · Hempfield GRVTY (Bahn) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandi Tait mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · Hempfield GRVTY (Bahn) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Quyen Stehman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-10-03 · Hempfield - Culprits (Culp) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Hershey Jr
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-25 · Hempfield GRVTY (Bahn) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandi Tait mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-20 · Hempfield GRVTY (Bahn) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Quyen Stehman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-18 · Hempfield Have Mercy - Banh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lesley Agnew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-11 · Hempfield - Culprits (Culp) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Gochnauer
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Davis
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-18 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregg Felices
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Simmons
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Simmons
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-04 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikolaus Stoltzfus
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
46.3%
25W–29L · 47.5% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 45% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 35.9% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 48.2% of games
8.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 41.4% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
48.3%
14W–15L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
29 matches
#1 Singles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe