← Search

Christine Forester

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Bloomfield, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 53W–64L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history117 matches
L
2026-10-18 · WESS-Muhn 8.0X 55 & O F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Muhn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-27 · BT-Vanslingerlandt 55s 8.0 NW F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Joseph championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · BT-Vanslingerlandt 55s 8.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Marie Nadolski championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-09-19 · BT-Vanslingerlandt 55s 8.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Marie Nadolski championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-24 · PINE-Snell 8.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shawn Snell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-08-06 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dawn Clegg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-03 · PINE-Snell 8.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dan Christ mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-28 · PINE-Atallah (inside) 18s 9.0X F · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ray Patalinghug mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-07-27 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Myrna Harbar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · BT-Vanslingerlandt 55s 8.0 NW F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Marie Nadolski
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · BT-Vanslingerlandt 55s 8.0 NW F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Joseph
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ritsuko Nakano
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
35.1%
20W–37L · 49.1% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.6% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 43.2% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
24 matches
#1 Singles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches
Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova