← Search

Dawn Clegg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomfield Hills, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 108W–112L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history220 matches
L
2026-11-01 · FAC-Harbar 55s 8.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Howard Weingarden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Souheil Saba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · WESS-Horcoff 4.0W Fall Singles F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · FAC-Harbar 55s 8.0 NW F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Bergman
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-08-06 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christine Forester
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carolyn Kennedy
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · FAC-Harbar 55s 8.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Bergman
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Tavernit
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · TROY-Jackson 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Severine Magrex
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · TROY-Jackson 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Chidiac
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-10 · FAC-Bartholomew 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Pollak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ritsuko Nakano
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
84%
21W–4L · 63.8% of games
4.0
37.6%
32W–53L · 44.4% of games
7.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.4% of games
7.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 60.3% of games
8.0
31.2%
10W–22L · 42.2% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 50.5% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
35 matches
#1 Singles
11%
25 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches
Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King