← Search

Shun Quon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saratoga, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 53W–55L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history108 matches
L
2026-03-20 · SARATOGA TC 65AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gordon van Zuiden
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-09 · SARATOGA TC 65AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Dikas
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-09 · SARATOGA TC S70M8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gordon van Zuiden
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-31 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Freeman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-22 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ignatius Chan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-08 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Freeman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-09-29 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexander Warren
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-09-10 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tosh Okano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-09-08 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexander Warren
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-04-11 · SARATOGA TC 65AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Sorenson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-02 · SARATOGA TC 65AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Means
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-18 · SARATOGA TC 65AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Means
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.1% of games
7.0
81%
17W–4L · 64% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
47.2%
25W–28L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 42.9% of games
8.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe