← Search

Alexander Warren

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Berkeley, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 22W–17L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history39 matches
L
2025-09-29 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shun Quon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-09-18 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Katzman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-09-15 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Rocero
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-09-08 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shun Quon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-04-09 · PLEASANTON 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Rocero
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-08 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barry Greenwald
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-04-02 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with DAN MADISON
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-03-19 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Day
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-03-11 · PLEASANTON 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Soto
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-03-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Kreiter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-03 · PLEASANTON 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Rocero
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-10-23 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Rocero
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.4% of games
6.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.7% of games
7.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer