← Search

Eric Wall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pleasant Hill, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 71W–77L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history148 matches
W
2026-11-01 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Boral
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Greg Backens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-27 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richard Morgan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-21 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gary Bettencourt
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Keeling championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edgar Hawkyard championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-04 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gordon Bonneville championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-28 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with LOUIS CASTANEDA
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-22 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gordon Bonneville
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phillip Johnson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jay Desai
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edgar Hawkyard
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
42.6%
29W–39L · 46.8% of games
6.0
61.3%
19W–12L · 52.7% of games
6.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 47.1% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 44.6% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
42 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King