← Search

Michael Bloomstein

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walnut Creek, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 102W–83L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history185 matches
W
2026-10-20 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Katzman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-16 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathan Brand
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bruce Koliha
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dale Lifson championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ahmed Nisar
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tony LaFrance
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-16 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Kreiter
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-12 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bruce Koliha
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathan Brand
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-12 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dale Lifson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-21 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Katzman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-10-09 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lonnie Arroyo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
60.7%
37W–24L · 52.9% of games
6.0
54.2%
45W–38L · 52.5% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.2% of games
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 48.8% of games
6.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
47 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe