← Search

Perry Seto

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Orinda, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
183 matches · 94W–89L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history183 matches
L
2026-09-27 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with George Braue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-0
L
2026-05-21 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul David
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eduardo Zerbini championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Satcher
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-04-25 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gary Bettencourt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-04 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Wong championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-12 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edgar Hawkyard
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-26 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with LOUIS CASTANEDA
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-28 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gordon Bonneville
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-18 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gordon Bonneville
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-01 · LAFAYETTE TC 55MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-30 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Pratt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
48.1%
25W–27L · 51% of games
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 48.2% of games
6.0
53.1%
17W–15L · 54.6% of games
6.5
70%
14W–6L · 60.2% of games
7.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
60%
24W–16L · 57.4% of games
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
49 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams